MED 300 Field Experience Portfolio
Due December 6th, 2007 at 4pmYour portfolio is your self-portrait in relation to your field experience. It should demonstrate your growth and competence in understanding of content, instruction, and assessment, as well as your ability to critically analyze your teaching performance, with respect to issues and practices raised in MED 308 over the semester.
The portfolio should address the following areas*:
lesson plans reflect:
-awareness of appropriate content, student diversity, and learning styles
-appropriate use of manipulatives and technology
-varied instructional formats including individual and cooperative structures
-tasks reflective of state assessment and scoring guidelines
-student awareness of state assessment and scoring guidelines
-ability to monitor your own teaching effectiveness through review and analysis of your teaching behavior and the learners' performance
-appropriate lesson modification and ability to use available resources
You portfolio must include selections of your work and commentary on why you selected the item. Items might include journal entries, lesson plans, activities, assessments, photos of students working, and perhaps excerpts from readings that are particularly important for your thinking about and understanding of a specific area. Your portfolio should demonstrate your growth in understanding. Your commentary should include the rationale for the particular item being included in the portfolio including why it is significant in terms of the above criteria, what learning (yours) occurred or was prompted by the item (i.e., how it contributed to your growth), and what, if any, implications the item has for future teaching endeavors. At the end of the portfolio, you should include a reflective and critical paper that summarizes your growth in the practice of teaching as it relates to the ideas that arose in this course and your field experience.
Evaluation
The following is the rubric that will be used to
evaluate your efforts.
|
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Planning |
Comprehensive
understanding of content; appropriate selection of topics; strong
implementation discussion; analysis, extension, justification |
Broad
understanding of content; appropriate selection of topics; good
implementation discussion; analysis, some extension |
Some
understanding of content; mostly appropriate selection of topics;
adequate implementation discussion; analysis |
Basic
understanding of content; some inappropriate selection of topics,
inadequate discussion and analysis |
|
|
Practice
integrates technology and manipulatives (commercial and non) through
student-centered activities; Strong evidence of addressing diversity,
learning styles/ modalities; appropriate use of cooperative learning |
Practice
integrates technology or manipulatives (commercial and non) through
mostly student-centered activities; Evidence of addressing diversity,
learning styles/ modalities; appropriate use of cooperative learning |
Some evidence
of practice integrating technology or
manipulatives; Minimal evidence of addressing diversity, learning
styles/ modalities; little use of cooperative learning and/or
student-centered activities |
Minimal
evidence of practices integrating
technology or manipulatives; Minimal evidence of addressing diversity,
learning styles/ modalities; no evidence of cooperative learning and/or
student- centered activities |
|
|
Appropriate
selection and use of NYS problems and
scoring including student self- and peer assessment; assessment forms
used to assess understanding and inform instruction |
Evidence of
use of NYS problems and scoring including
student self-assessment; assessment forms used to assess understanding
and knowledge |
Evidence of
use of NYS problems and scoring |
Little
evidence of use of NYS problems and scoring |
|
|
Evidence of
comprehensive critique, reflection, and self-assessment; foundation in
course content and evidence in varied forms |
Evidence of
critique, reflection, and self-assessment; some foundation in course
content |
Some evidence
of critique, reflection, and self-assessment, little foundation in
course content |
Minimal
evidence of growth, reflection, critique; no foundation in course
content |
|
|
Thoroughly
thought through; creatively organized and connected; variety of items;
exemplary communication |
Thoughtfully
written and developed; good communication; well organized; variety of
items |
Organization
follows strict suggested outline; little variety of items, acceptable
level of communication |
Inadequate
organization, communication and development; closer to a notebook or
folder than a portfolio |
Total possible points: 20